Here is a question that we received. We have decided to render the answer public, enjoy your reading.

Question

Some research is telling me that there is perhaps several different types and/or processes for White Powder Gold.  In other words that WPG is not all exactly the same?  Is this true?  For instance there is WPG that is made according to the patent of David Hudson,  And then there is the True Classical Philosopher’s Stone, I understand… Is there any other’s?  What do you know about this?  And what types do you know about and teach?  Is it based off of  David Hudson?  or is it something else??

Our answer

Dear (name removed),

Your questions need quite an essay to answer… We’ll try to make it as short as possible. Let’s go in chronological order.

We began thinking about Hudson’s method but it is full of extremely hazardous steps, chemicals, so we searched on and on. We found the Don Nance method, which uses easier to handle chemicals to dissolve the gold. In other chemical aspects, that method is essentially the same as Hudson’s.

We first realized that there is a missing step in both methods, so you can’t get anything following them. We solved this problem, found out what to do. And it worked then, we consumed what we produced. The first dose we made gave such powerful and unmistakable “consciousness expansion” effect on both of us, that we KNEW, we had the real thing.

We began to produce the stuff, it became our first and most important activity. We consumed all what we made. We actually lived in the laboratory, spent our nights there, etc. This is important to understand. Our whole life centered around the Stone.

We got to know more and more about it. One day it “came into our eyes” that something is not OK.

We began to think about the process and think over the process, made experiments. And then we realized that this powder can’t come from the gold or can’t come solely from the gold. It took 3 whole days to understand what we saw, because it was against all physical and chemical “rules” we had known. It was like going crazy, mind twisting and bending trying to understand and search out what is really happening in the reaction flask. We did all possible measurements and experiments till finally we understood – or rather accepted – what we saw.

(By the way, that was the time when I – Judit – realized that sometime earlier I or maybe we had already made this stuff and was murdered because of it. It was really fearful to feel in all its details that I was so close to something and I failed. I died with all the pain of knowing that it ran out of my hands. And I felt that pain sitting before the flask in real time.)

So the conclusions we have are these:

Neither Hudson, nor anybody else we know did understand really what was happening. Chemistry deluded them. If you are totally rooted in classical chemistry and physics, your eyes will see what you believe in, you will find proof for that in analytical results, and you will never think “beyond”. You have to accept that there might be something else or something more to see that something.

We have a close friend in the US with firm chemical, physical and biological academic background. He had had analyses of the powder. The analyses gave the same results as Hudson’s, but a different method was used.

But: Hudson says, this white powder consists of monoatomic transient elements. The spectroscopic method he used is based on heating the powder for a relatively long time on a graphite electrode and then assaying it. Then it assays as these elements. Nobody ever proved that they are really monoatomic. It is just a speculation, although might be true. Hudson thought his white powder WAS a monoatomic transient metal mixture when he put it onto the electrode. It was not!! When this powder meets graphite on high temperature and long enough time, it TURNS into these transient elements. White powder IS NOT a transient metal mixture, it TURNS to that in certain circumstances!

We put our powder into a graphite vessel, covered it all with graphite powder and then heated it at 1400 Celsius for 24-36 hours. Then the tiny metallic particles produced during this time were assayed – and guess what, the mixture assayed just like Hudson’s material.

The human body is somekind of an alchemical crucible. It can “use” this powder.

Moreover, when you put the powder into a Faraday cage, you can feel its Meisner field. We tried several methods to utilize its power. You can put it into a metal pendant and wear it in your neck, for example. It has a profound effect even this way, just by constantly interacting with the aura of the body.

Now regarding the question about the “real thing”, the “real” Philosopher’s Stone:

The real and only “proof” for us is what has been happening to us and others consuming it. If it were NOT the real stuff, we would NEVER get to this condition we are in. Contemplate it…

First you need or rather must understand that this stuff is “thought sensitive”. Now we know that our thought or expectation during the synthesis defines the quality of material we get. We mean not the exact material or elemental composition but the qualities, capabilities of the material. As our intention, and note that we were two, two parallel intentions, at that time was only to get a stuff that helps to reach enlightenment (especially as we did not know that then, that there might be other qualities possible to get) we got that one. This is the naked truth.

Now we can make healing powders designed exactly for a sick person to heal him/her. And it works and now we have doctors sending their incurable patients to us. Or rather to Thomas, as he is the MD. And they recover from their condition. The only exception might be when the soul does really want to quit – but we haven’t met such a case yet.

This knowledge is somewhat of an Alchemical secret. Nobody talks about it. We can understand that now, this is wise to behave so. If or when you are “ready”, it will come to you. You cannot search for it. You can only find it. Or does it find you? Maybe.

The only one personal report on the internet about the effect of wpg is an interview with an unidentified man from Hudson’s group. It is rather dim or misty when you read it and you don’t understand what he says and why he says it so.

Now we know. Our whole experience-mass is so “otherworldy” in a way that it is almost incommunicable.

All the best,

Thomas&Judit